> Passwords:
The Biggest Security Problem for Corporate Networks
> Effective Ways of Fighting
CyberCrimes: Tougher Punishment?
> 2002 Computer Crime
and Security Survey
Passwords: The Biggest
Security Problem for Corporate Networks
Breaking a RANDOM eight-character password would take more than
13 years on average even for the password-cracking programs that
can test nearly 8 million combinations every second on the latest
Pentium 4 processor. But majority of passwords are not made of random
characters. Rather, they are meaningful words that can be easily
remembered. Sometimes, they have a few numerical extensions, which
do not complicate the hacker's life to any significant extent.
Hackers can crack most of commonly used passwords in less than a
minute. And once they discover passwords on one server, they frequently
have the way to other servers. Having stolen the digital keys to
a large fraction of the accounts on the network, an intruder can
wander about preserving the appearance of a legitimate user. "Passwords
are one of the biggest security problems that corporate America
has," said Chris Pick, associate vice president for product strategy
at PentaSafe Security Technologies. This is why scientists are developing
the authentication technologies other than passwords, for example
graphics and biometrics. Meantime, the Internet security gurus offer
the following common sense rules for passwords:
- Don't use dictionary words. Webster's New World College Dictionary
has 163,000 words in it. The smallest dictionary in a password
cracker has more than 200,000; it includes places and popular
names, such as Spock. Do the math.
- Don't use personal information. Social security numbers, telephone
numbers, date of birth, and the names of kids, pets and significant
others should all be considered off-limits.
- Do use numbers and symbols, and not just at the end. To generate
memorable passwords, use the first letter of each word in a memorable
sentence and then randomly capitalize some letters and add numbers
and special characters.
- Do use a different password on each important system. Assume
that the administrator for each system can decipher your password
for that system; don't give them access to all of your accounts.
By using different passwords, you limit the damage of a breach
to a single account.
- Don't give your password out to anyone. No one, not even the
system administrator, needs your password. If someone asks for
your password, assume the worst.
Source: Chris Wysopal, director
of R&D for @Stake.
To read the CNET Security Report by Robert Lemos, entitled Passwords:
The weakest link click
here. To discuss this note or send your own ideas on creating
safe passwords, please visit our discussion
boards and/or write ideas@ipri.org.
Effective Ways of
Fighting CyberCrimes: Tougher Punishment?
Under current law, punishment for cybercrimes often results in
little or no jail time. For example, the author of the Melissa computer
virus, which caused $1.2 billion in damage, was sentenced to 20
months in prison and a $5,000 fine. Likewise, current law prohibits
Internet Service Providers from reporting user activity unless it
presents an immediate risk of death or injury, and allows customers
to sue for damages if their privacy is violated.
Under a new law, whose bill was unanimously approved by the House
Judiciary Committee and sent to the House floor for a full vote,
computer criminals could face life in prison. The bill also would
help Internet service providers to report suspicious activity on
their networks. "Cybercrime knows no borders or restraints and can
harm the nation's economy and threaten its security," said Rep.
Lamar Smith, R-Texas, who sponsored the bill that would coordinate
efforts to fight cybercrime.
Although supported by Internet service providers, who complain
of having to determine the gravity of threats made in their chat
rooms or contained in customer e-mails, the bill is criticized by
the Center for Democracy and Technology, a civil-liberties group,
who said it could further erode electronic privacy by encouraging
law enforcement and other government agencies to pressure ISPs to
turn over their records without a search warrant.
It remains to be seen what human rights activists, psychologists,
and social workers will say on whether tougher sentencing laws will
be any more EFFECTIVE for fighting cybercrime than they have been
for fighting drugs, violence, and other crimes.
To read "House panel raises cost of cybercrime" by Reuters,
May 8, 2002, click here.
To discuss alternative ways of fighting cybercrime, please visit our
discussion
boards and/or write content@internet-psychology.org.
2002 Computer
Crime and Security Survey
"2002 Computer Crime and Security Survey" confirms that
the threat from computer crime and other information security breaches
continues unabated and that the financial toll is mounting. The
survey is based on responses from 503 computer security practitioners
in U.S. corporations, government agencies, financial institutions,
medical institutions and universities. Its highlights include:
- 90% of respondents (primarily large corporations and government
agencies) detected computer security breaches within the last
twelve months;
- 80% acknowledged financial losses due to computer breaches;
- 74% cited their Internet connection as a frequent point of attack
than cited their internal systems as a frequent point of attack
(33%);
- 44% (223 respondents, who were willing and/or able to quantify
their financial losses), reported $455,848,000 in financial losses.
Respondents detected a wide range of attacks and abuses, whose
examples include:
- Computer viruses (85%);
- Employee abuse of Internet access privileges (for example, downloading
pornography or pirated software, or inappropriate use of e-mail
systems ( 78%);
- System penetration from the outside ( 40% );
- Denial of service attacks ( 40% ),
- 52% of the respondents conduct electronic commerce on their
sites;
- 38% suffered unauthorized access or misuse on their Web sites
within the last twelve months;
- 21% said that they didn't know if there had been unauthorized
access or misuse;
- 25% of those acknowledging attacks reported from two to five
incidents;
- 39%t reported ten or more incidents;
- 70% those attacked reported vandalism (only 64% in 2000);
- 55% reported denial of service (only 60% in 2000);
- 12% reported theft of transaction information;
- 6% reported financial fraud (only 3% in 2000).
However, Patrice Rapalus, Director of Computer Security Institute
(CSI), remarks that "there is much more illegal and unauthorized
activity going on in cyberspace than corporations admit to their
clients, stockholders and business partners or report to law enforcement.
Incidents are widespread, costly and commonplace".
The "Computer Crime and Security Survey," he says, has served as
a reality check for industry and government. "Over its seven-year
life span, the survey has told a compelling story. It has underscored
some of the verities of the information security profession, for
example that technology alone cannot thwart cyber attacks and that
there is a need for greater cooperation between the private sector
and the government. It has also challenged some of the profession's
'conventional wisdom,' for example that the 'threat from inside
the organization is far greater than the threat from outside the
organization' and that 'most hack attacks are perpetrated by juveniles
on joy-rides in cyberspace.' Over the seven-year life span of the
survey, a sense of the 'facts on the ground' has emerged".
The "Computer Crime and Security Survey" is conducted by CSI with
the participation of the San Francisco Federal Bureau of Investigation's
(FBI) Computer Intrusion Squad. The aim of this effort is to raise
the level of security awareness, as well as help determine the scope
of computer crime in the United States.
CSI, established in 1974, is a San Francisco-based association
of information security professionals. It has thousands of members
worldwide and provides a wide variety of information and education
programs to assist practitioners in protecting the information assets
of corporations and governmental organizations.
The FBI, in response to an expanding number of instances in which
criminals have targeted major components of information and economic
infrastructure systems, has established the National Infrastructure
Protection Center (NIPC) located at FBI headquarters and the Regional
Computer Intrusion Squads located in selected offices throughout
the United States. The NIPC, a joint partnership among federal agencies
and private industry, is designed to serve as the government's lead
mechanism for preventing and responding to cyber attacks on the
nation's infrastructures. (These infrastructures include telecommunications,
energy, transportation, banking and finance, emergency services
and government operations). The mission of Regional Computer Intrusion
Squads is to investigate violations of Computer Fraud and Abuse
Act (Title 8, Section 1030), including intrusions to public switched
networks, major computer network intrusions, privacy violations,
industrial espionage, pirated computer software and other crimes.
For a free copy of "2002 Computer Crime and Security
Survey," complete with graphs, charts and analysis, please fill
out the Survey
Request Form.
http://www.gocsi.com/press/20020407.html
|